Welcome President-Elect Donald J. Trump- Please help us Make America Great Again!


Helping to restore our Constitutional Republic

How Important is the Obama Eligibility Issue?

Is the man who calls himself Barack Hussein Obama ineligible to hold the office of U.S. President? Should he be removed? Should he be prevented from running again?

We have been told by multiple politicians, media people and "pundits" that there is no chance that anything at all will come of the Obama Presidential eligibility challenges ….
- Because there is already a birth certificate (hokum: the long form submission is a proven fraud))

- Becuase he's considered "natural born" (Not according to Minor vs Happersett ruling)
- Because he's already in office (so was Nixon)
- Because no one has "standing" to sue him (right so far, per courts)
- Because the media and pols don't WANT to talk about it (starting to change)
- Because it would be too risky to "change horses" in mid stream (you don't think what is happening under Obama is already HIGHLY risky?)
- Because the eligibility law is obsolete-- (Really? Why?)
- Because the charges are “racist?” (Really? Why is it “racist” to go after an incompetent, arrogant, inexperienced, likely ineligible Marxist usurper, who is laying waste to the US Constitution and our beloved nation?)


"Eligibility?" What's that all about?

The founders placed a Presidential eligibility clause in the Constitution, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5: 

"No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."

While they did not specify what a natural born citizen is in this section, other references to citizenship in the document and in other correspondence make it clear that they viewed a natural born citizen as someone born in the USA of two citzen parents. Vattels' Law of Nations is a prime reference they used, which supports this. The Minor vs. Happersett case ruling, in 1875, established a legal precedent upholding that definition of a natural born citizen. Recent discussion by opponents attempts to conflate and make it equivalent to native born, or naturalized citizenship, which are not the same at alL.

Why did the founders bother to establish this requirement?  Because they believed that an  undivided loyalty to the US, which native birth and citizen parents helped to ensure, was very important for the most powerful executive, in the highest office in the land. The results of not ensuring this have become readily apparent since January 20, 2009. Now, we need to fix the nightmare problem of an ineligible usurper in the White House.


What has been done?

Orly Taitz. eligibility attorney, is

interviewed outside of Federal District Court, Santa Ana, CA, after a contentious hearing in front of Judge David Carter on the Barnett vs Obama case, on 10-5-09. A DOJ team of attorneys was doing Obama's dirty work, on your dime.

So far, Congress, courts, electoral college, state legislators, Attorneys-General, Secretaries of State, Sheriffs, prosecutors, DoD, MSM, FBI and even the Electoral College, have failed to act, although several state bills are in process and HR1503 was introduced. Over a hundred lawsuits were filed. Several promising court cases have been dismissed in the face of strong evidence, citing “standing” (no one has the right to claim harm by Obama’s illegal election and harmful actions ) and “jurisdiction,” (not my job, man!). An outstanding military officer has been jailed, careers sidetracked and deployment orders rescinded, to avoid facing the truth. Multiple citizens’ grand juries have indicted “Obama.” This is beyond absurd, folks. Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona- Maricopa County- is now conducting a "Cold Case Posse" investigation!

Recent events, such as:

- The unjust conviction, incarceration, discharge, stripping of pension and disgrace by an Army kangaroo court martial of LTC Terry Lakin
- Refusal to hear two Supreme Court eligibility suits, assisted by Kagan, who formerly handled Obama's eligibility suits as Solicitor General. Both Kagan and Sotomayer were handpicked by Obama and unethically refused to recuse themselves from these deliberations.
- Inept posturing by new HI Gov. Abercrombie, news conferences where he vowed to show proof of Obama's HI birth, which he has repeatedly failed to do, amid vague mumbled excuses and dissembling.
- Sworn testimony by a former HI records official that the birth certificate and corroborating hospital records never existed.

- New interest because of statements and investigations by Donald Trump (which Rep.Darrel Issa failed to do). Switch of positions by Russ Limbaugh, Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin and millions of Americans

- Electrifying Orly Taitz CNN interview

- Revelations of Hawaii election law fraud to get Obama on the Hawaii (and other) ballots

- New interest in Obama Social Security fraud allegations

- May 2 9th District Court of Appeals hearing, in Pasadena, CA, of Barnett, Keyes at al, vs Obama- still no ruling

- Revelations of Hawaii election law fraud to get Obama on the Hawaii (and other) ballots

- Release of purported "Long Form Birth Certificate" (digital image only) 4-27-11

- Release of "birth certificate" digital image by Obama declared a forgery by dozens of document experts

- Filing of FBI criminal complaint on above. No action so far.

- Filing of demand for actual HI birth certificate- refused, Attorney and document experts going to Hawakii 8-8-11, now 10/11.

- E-Verify check fail in 8/11.

- Judge authorized discovery for Taitz suit on Obama Social Security number. Case was dismissed and is now under a motion for reconsideration.

- SupremeCourt dismissed appeal of The case is Keyes v. Bowen, 10-1351. Presidential candidate Alan Keyes wanted the certification of Obama's victory halted in California until there was documented proof by a state official that he was eligible to be president. The Supreme Court of California threw out the lawsuit.

- Dismissal of Taitz v Astrue Social Security case. Now under motion for reconsideration.

- Refusal of subpoena of Hawaii birth certificate, dismissal of case challenging that. Another hearing scheduled November , 2011.


LTC Terry Lakin, court-martialed and convicted. He challenged Obama directly.

… Have served to attract much more attention to an enormous Constitutional issue and threat to our republic that powerful forces want to just go away.

Regardless of where he was born, Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Soebarkah (I’ve included all of his most commonly known names) may still not be eligible because:

- His father was a foreigner
- His putative mother wasn’t old enough, nor had sufficient contiguous residence to confer citizenship
- The possible adoption by Soetoro might mean that Obama was an Indonesian citizen
- Obama may not even be his legal name
- He may have claimed foreign student scholarships
- He appears to have at least 16 fraudulent Social Security numbers, including 042-68-4425

- He failed an E-Verify check in 8/11
- It is likely that his draft registration was forged

- May not even be who he says he is

Obama Sr., partying while supposely married, while Obama's mother was placed in Seatle, WA area studying.

Next Steps
Whether or not we can have his election nullified, there may be a case for impeaching him and there is a strong possibility that we can get him off the next ballot, or convince the Democrats that it is in no one’s interest to renominate such a huge liability on the ticket. In the meantime, we can help destroy his credibility, if he’s not already doing enough on his own, and help bring his evil agenda to a near standstill.

Whether or not you believe Obama is ineligible, there is more than enough doubt to justify clearing the air, via some type of public hearings that will ferret out the facts, via subpoenas legal discovery and testimony and rulings on the facts and interpretations of the Constitution and the law as they apply to them.

Possible steps:

- State legislative action on eligibility requirements

- Secretary of State or Attorneys-General actions

- Criminal charges and prosecution

- State court action

- Federal court action

- Electoral College challenge

- Intensified media debate

- DoD nullification of LTC Lakin conviction

- Citizen protests, grand juries, petitions, interview, contact legislators

- Remove judges who refused to act

- Remove legislators who refused to act

- Write web sites blogs, emails, comments, tell friends, family, church, associates

- Pressure officials to act

- Nominate candidates who will act

- Donate to groups taking action

Will you sign up for any of that?


Please comment on the various cases, issues, actions, events, techniques and ways to pursue them. As a lot of the evidence is there, but we need support to authorize investigations and lawsuits that will have real teeth to compel legal discovery, testimony, action, as well as alerting millions to demand action from our non-performing, so-called “leaders.”


































"We are not "Birthers," we are Obama Eligibility Challengers

-- Our opponents are "Deniers."

more on eligibility deniers


Barnett, Drake, Keyes, et al vs. Obama Appeal hearing was May 2, Pasadena, CA

Views: 907


Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

For most people it is unfathomable to comprehend the President actually trying to crash the economy.  The following graphic put the enormity of our situation in perspective. See the original art at http://www.wtfnoway.com/

The following shows the national debt as $100 bills and attributes the relative amount of spending to recent administrations.

Now that the Boehner bill has passed with no meaningful cuts in the rate of current spending, this is the best we can expect in 2016.

Proof that the so-called "birth certificate" was electronically created



From the Congressional Research Service:

Page 5 under notes:

27 Arguments have been raised that, under the 14th Amendment, one is now a citizen of the United States if one is either “born or naturalized in the United States,” and that such two methods of citizenship are exclusive. See, e.g., United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. supra at 702-703; Rogers v. Bellei, 401 U.S. 815, 841 (1971), J. Black dissenting: “All means of obtaining American citizenship which are dependant on congressional enactment are forms of naturalization.”


Under the notes an important distinction is made between a naturalized citizen and a natural born citizen.  This concurs with British law as well.  Anyone made citizen through legislation is not a natural born citizen.  The 14th Amendment is the instrument that gave citizenship to Obama.  Were it not for the legislative approval, Obama would not be a citizen of the United States.  Therefore, he is not a natural born citizen, since he is dependant on the adoption and ratification of the 14th Amendment and the two methods of citizenship are mutually exclusive.


On Page 5, note 29 Maskell perjures himself:


29 The Constitution of the United States of America, Analysis and Interpretation, S. Doc. 108-17, 108th Cong., 2d Sess. at 456-457 (2004). The United States Senate has also stated its opinion by way of unanimous consent, in S. Res. 511, 110th Congress, that “natural born citizens” include those persons who are citizens “at birth” by statute by virtue of being born abroad of United States citizens.


The Senate Resolution 511 says no such thing.  In fact it states that the place of McCain's birth is not relevant, but McCain derives natural born citizenship from citizen parents. "Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens. . ."


see for yourself, the whole of S. Res. 511, final version:


Apr 30, 2008 - Agreed to Senate. This is the latest version of the bill currently available on GovTrack.






2d Session


S. RES. 511


Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.




April 10, 2008


Mrs. MCCASKILL (for herself, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. OBAMA, Mr. COBURN, Mrs. CLINTON, and Mr. WEBB) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary


April 24, 2008


Reported by Mr. LEAHY, without amendment


April 30, 2008


Considered and agreed to




Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.


Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen' of the United States;


Whereas the term `natural born Citizen', as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;


Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their country's President;


Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the `natural born Citizen' clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress's own statute defining the term `natural born Citizen';


Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and enhanced by the men and women who are assigned to serve our country outside of our national borders;


Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President; and


Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it


Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.

Math lesson for lawyers and politicians.

Obama has outspent the government's income by $4.4 trillion.

Congress in their infinite compromising wisdom has given Obama another $2.4 trillion to spend, which Nancy Pelosi thinks will last him the rest of his 1st term in office. That comes to overspending $6.8 trillion in 4 years, which is more than $1 trillion more than this country outspent their income in the 1st 214 years.

Let's say we have 310 million people. If you divide $6.8 trillion by 310 million people it is $21,935 per person.

My plan would have been to give every man woman and child in the country $21,935.  Don't tell me there wouldn't be people spending that money. You would have seen the biggest demand for products in history.

But Obama has found a way to distribute the money in such a way that jobs are lost and the nation is on the brink of collapse.  Not only that, but if we take out a 30 year mortgage on that money it will cost each of us more than $42,000 to pay it back. Wait, there is more. Obama and the Congress have agreed to cut spending in such a way that the spending actually goes up every year.  So we can look forward to less jobs and more debt forever. Don't worry, after they completely gut the military some Communist country or Canada or Mexico or some flea bag Muslim nation will conquer us and they will explain how we should pay them back.

BH Obama's name cannot be on a 2012 ballot until he is vetted - that means he is eligable to run for the office of the USA.
If that was true, he never would have been allowed to run in 2008. But no one forced  the issue and now he is in the White House,.
Nancy did not vet BH Obama. We have to demand that our laws are followed. BH Obama must prove that he is eligable before his name appears as a candidate.
Nancy Pelosi knowingly covered up for Obama by certifying him constitutionally eligible to be President. She did this as chair of the DNC.  This vouching was done only to Hawaii, because the Hawaiian Democrat Party refused to vouch for him, because they knew he is not eligible.  The other 49 states had no such assurances, although the DNC has always certified their candidate as constitutionally eligible in past elections.

Below, the top document sent to Hawaii said, "are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution."
The bottom document sent to the other 49 states makes no such assurances.
For their part in knowingly covering up a felony, Nancy Pelosi and Alice Germond need to be charged with misprision of felony.
How do we get her charged and I'll start it?


We can send her letters, but we really need to wait until Obama is removed from office for ineligibility.


© 2018   Created by Greg.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service