Welcome President-Elect Donald J. Trump- Please help us Make America Great Again!

ConstitutionalReset.com

Helping to restore our Constitutional Republic

How to Communicate and Motivate People to act on Obama's ineligibility

So, what to DO about it?

 

We have lots of information casting doubt on "Obama's" ineligibility to be President, his unsuitability for the job, his corruption and his impeachable acts when in office. To get anything done about it, we/you will have to communicate it to The People, officials, political parties and other organizations, to inform them and then to motivate them to act. All of these people have been contacted already, but few feel the need to act, so massive numbers of us need to help them see the light.

 

You can also help by contributing to organizations working to end Obama's "Presidency." Several ways:

- Support organizations communicating the message, such as wnd.com, thepostemail.com, colony14.net

- Support legal action. OrlyTaitzesq.com is the most active.  Mario Appuzzo is a leading eligibility attorney, as is Leo Donorio. 

- Pay for ads, signs, literature.

 

Protest, in some cases even boycott, the worst organizations refusing to cover eligibility, or distorting the truth. These include ALL TV stations, Fox, too. I rarely watch TV anymore.  Most newspapers will not give it a fair shake. Only some of the "alternative" news organizations and blogs will, although these numbers are now growing.

 

Speak out, at political, civic, even private social, events. We should be way past worrying about who is offended by our pointing out an illegal, unconstitutional "President" and the terrible effects of having an incompetent, America-hating Marxist at the helm.

 

 

Free Service!

Send email blasts about Obama's ineligibility to your officials and...

 

More information is in the "How Important is the Obama Eligibility Issue"  Forum Discussion on this site. Far more reader comments appear in these Tea Party forums (requiring free membership):

- http://www.the912project.us/forum/topics/how-important-is-the-obama

- http://www.teapartynation.com/forum/topics/the-eligibility-issue?

 

Various ideas and model letters follow,  to help communicate the message ....

 

We will be adding sample communications, such as:

- Letters to politicians- left and right

- Letters to media

- Letters to people who are sympathetic, but need motivation to act

- Letters to people who are neutral or a little skeptical

- Public speaking

 

 

 

 

Note the pdf of U.S Sheriffs attached below, which you can download and use to demand investigations of the usurper, like Sheriff Joe is doing!

Views: 1220

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

(placeholder)

Sample follow-up letter to state legislator

 

Rep. Horrigan:

 

You and/or your staff should dig much deeper into the background, ideology, associates, activity and eligibility of the man who calls himself Barack Hussein Obama, AKA "Soetoro," "Soebarkah," "Bounel" and who knows what else.

 

The  lack of care, or deliberate ignoring of the truth, in vetting this man for the most important job in the world is simply appalling. When you take an incompetent, inexperienced, arrogant, narcissistic, ineligible left wing ideologue, with divided loyalties and entrust such an office as POTUS to him, the results are not so surprising. 

 

It is my understanding that you have been made aware of these things:

 

- The Minor vs. Happerset ruling means that "Obama" is NOT eligible to be President. It is fairly clear from study of the founders work on the Constitution and their primary references, that they regarded a natural born citizen as someone born in the USA, of two citizen parents.

- Multiple investigators have established proven, irrefutable links of "Obama" to at least 16 stolen Social Security numbers and a seemingly forged draft card, obtained with SS # 042-68-4425 and using a form that was only developed years after the purported filing date. Such crimes are usually committed either because the criminal could not legally obtain documentation, or uses it for some type of financial or identity crime.

- Multiple so-called "birth certificates" have been proven forgeries, including the one touted by Obama at the 4-27-11 press conference and placed on the White House web site.  Dozens of document experts have now declared it a fraud, providing copious evidence.

- "Obama" has blocked efforts to obtain information about his background, spending an alleged $2MM in legal fees and stealing the services of Justice Dept. Attorneys who should be prosecuting, not defending him.

 

If by some fluke you have NOT received word of this, we would be willing to again forward you the specifics.

 

I could go on and on and there is much more horrible detail, but let me instead make an important point. You have been informed of most of these facts aand much more, but seemingly have not acted in good faith to verify or initiate actions for further investigation, legal or other action.  I have been told that you are technically guilty of misprision of felony, for not reporting and/or acting upon incriminating information. Other state officials have attempted to wash their hands of this affair, claiming it is a Congressional issue. Congress in turn has told us it's acourt issue, while the courts claim it's Congress.  We are putting you all on notice that we will hold you ALL accountable for sweeping the biggest political scandal in history under the rug. I fact, we will no longer allow it to proceed unchallenged.

 

There are several things you should be doing NOW, such as:

 

- Tightening up your state ballot eligibility vetting, so that this can NEVER again happen.  Find out why your Secretary of State was asleep at the switch.

- Introducing a resolution demanding Congresional, FBI and court action (most cases were dismissed fraudulently, claiming plaintiffs had "no standing" or that another jurisdiction was appropriate). 

- Reviewing electoral college rules to improve accountability for such matters.

- Finding out why no prosecutors brought charges.

- Spreading the word to constituents, colleagues and those federal officials that should be acting on this, but are not.

 

The fact that you used a perceived (incorrectly) error in a small detail in Mr. LaRocque's narrative as an excuse to reject his entire case seems somewhat disingenuous to me. We will chalk that up to the mob psychology that now prevails and has falsely attempted to label this some "conspiracy theory."  It's not a theory. We presented certain proven facts. The conclusions seem supported by the facts and should be the basis for any discussion and subsequent call to action, not Alinskyite rhetoric.

 

I can understand how 'Groupthink" may have misinformed/paralyzed/intimidated most officials into inaction, but now that we have presented you with evidence, it is your duty to act.  In fact, you should want to.

 

Regards,

George Miller
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



-----Original Message-----
From: David LaRocque <dlarocq@roadrunner.com>
To: Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu
Cc: 'Hudgins, Rep. Zack' <Zack.Hudgins@leg.wa.gov>; salpace@gmail.com
Sent: Mon, Jul 25, 2011 5:43 pm
Subject: RE: Response from NH State Rep. Timothy Horrigan

Timothy,

 

Thank you for responding to my message. It is most gratifying to get a response to my concerns from an elected official, something my local congressman has refused to provide.  

 

I have some supporting information about Valerie Jarrett to share with you, but before doing so I would ask you to pass on my greetings to your colleague in the NH legislature who was a Navy shipmate. Steve Winter and I served together in Vietnam as fellow naval aviators in Patrol Squadron One. I saw Steve several years ago at a squadron reunion at a time when Steve was running for the office he now holds.

 

While based at JFK with TWA, I lived in Connecticut and made numerous trips to Eliot, Maine near Portsmouth, NH. I found Portsmouth to be a charming and lovely New England city. Many of my fellow TWA pilots resided in New Hampshire and found living in your state most agreeable.

 

Below is an excerpt from the Wikipedia entry for Ms. Jarrett which documents her birth in Iran (although this fact is of no particular significance as far as I know in connection with Barack Obama’s eligibility to serve as president), and below that some information about her family’s ties to the Communist Party USA:

 

After reading this information (including the full Trevor Loudon article) would you be kind enough to advise me what it is about this information that makes the rest of my story implausible?  

 

Among the few responses I have received so far from legislators across the nation is one from Rep. Zack Hudgins, a member of the legislature in the state of Washington. You may find his response and my follow-up response back to him of interest.

 

I look forward to your further comments and your answers to the four questions I posed to Rep. Hudgins.

 

Respectfully,

 

David F. LaRocque

CDR USNR (ret)

 

Personal

Jarrett was born in Shiraz, Iran to American parents James E. Bowman and Barbara Taylor Bowman. Her father, a pathologist and geneticist, ran a hospital for children in Shiraz, as part of a program where American doctors and agricultural experts sought to help jump-start developing countries' health and farming efforts. When she was five, the family moved to London for one year, returning to Chicago in 1963.[citation needed]

In 1966 her mother, Barbara T. Bowman, was one of four child advocates that created the Erikson Institute. The Institute was established to provide advanced knowledge in child development for teachers and other professionals working with young children.[citation needed]

As a child she spoke Persian and French.[3]

Jarrett graduated from Northfield Mount Hermon in 1974. She earned a B.A. in Psychology from Stanford University in 1978, and a Juris Doctor (J.D.) from the University of Michigan Law School in 1981.[citation needed]

In 1983 Jarrett married Dr. William Robert Jarrett, son of famed Chicago Sun-Times reporter Vernon Jarrett. She attributes her switch from a private to a public career to their daughter Laura's birth and her own desire to do something that would make the daughter proud.[4]

To one reporter's e-mailed question about her divorce, she replied, "Married in 1983, separated in 1987, and divorced in 1988. Enough said."[4] In a Vogue profile, she further explained "We grew up together. We were friends since childhood. In a sense, he was the boy next door. I married without really appreciating how hard divorce would be."[4] William Jarrett died of a sudden heart attack in 1993.[4]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valerie_Jarrett

****************************************************************************************************

 

 

As to Ms. Jarrett’s family connections to the Communist Party, I would refer you to a recent article at www.trevorloudon.com

 

Valerie Jarrett’s Father-in-Law Was a Communist – Worked with Obama Mentor Frank Marshall Davis

Submitted by Trevor on June 6, 2011 – 8:54 pm EST 

Senior Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett’s late father-in-law and Chicago Sun-Times columnist Vernon Jarrett, was a key member of the South Chicago communist left of the late 1940s.

After graduating from Knoxville College in Tennessee, Jarrett moved to Chicago in 1946 to work as a journalist. On his first day on the job at the radical Chicago Defender, he was sent to cover a race riot.

The Defender was heavily influenced by the Communist Party USA and included on its roster well known Chicago Communist Party member Frank Marshall Davis.

Vernon Jarrett

Frank Marshall Davis

Jarrett and Davis worked on the Defender around the same time. They certainly knew each other through the Communist Party and its fronts…

Communist Frank Marshall Davis worked closely with comrade Vernon Jarrett in 1940s Chicago. Davis moved to Hawaii where he eventually met and mentored a young Barack Obama. Meanwhile Vernon Jarrett helped elect communist/socialist backed Harold Washington to the Chicago mayoralty. Washington’s victory inspired Barack Obama to move to Chicago, where his career was promoted by both Vernon Jarrett and the Communist Party.

Vernon Jarrett’s daughter-in-law Valerie Jarrett, worked for Harold Washington. Later she employed Barack Obama’s fiancee, Michelle Robinson, befriended the family and became one of President Obama’s most trusted advisers.

In Chicago, and nationally, the Communist Party threw its entire weight behind Obama’s Senate and Presidential campaigns.

Is this is all mere coincidence?

More importantly, given the connections of Frank Marshall Davis and the Communist Party USA to Soviet networks of the time, are there serious security implications here?

http://trevorloudon.com/2011/06/valerie-jarretts-father-in-law-was-...

 

 


From: Timothy Horrigan [mailto:timothyhorrigan@mac.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 10:19 PM
To: dlarocq@roadrunner.com
Subject: Re: Let the truth be known...David LaRocque speaks out!
 

 

I actually went to the Northfield Mount Hermon School with Valerie Jarrett.  She certainly wasn't a Communist back then.  And she was originally from Chicago, not Iran.

If she was born in Iran, it would have been circa 1957, long before the current regime took over.   And she would have been either a diplomatic brat or a missionary brat. Your detail about Valerie Jarrett kinda makes the rest of your story implausible.

Thanks,
NH State Rep. Timothy Horrigan



 

Sample #2 - follow-up letter to a state legislator

 

Zack,

I thank you for your response. However, I am quite disappointed that you did
not even begin to answer my simple questions. .

Frankly, I am stunned by your response. Apparently, to your way of thinking,
the Constitution and the rule of law are of no consequence. You are saying
that the specific requirements of the Constitution which apply to
determining eligibility for the office of president of the United States
should be overlooked and ignored because "the power rests with the people".

What does this mean? Do we make up the rules as we go? Can a fraudulent
election, or any election for that matter, overturn the Constitution of the
United States? If you believe this, you have no business serving in any
legislative body in this country, state or federal.

I simply cannot accept such a crazy notion.

I took an oath of office to "support and defend the Constitution of the
United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic" when I accepted a
commission as an officer of the United States Navy. This oath does not have
an expiration date, and I am very clear about what it requires of me. It
does not permit me to "choose what to believe" about the requirements of the
Constitution any more than it allows me to choose whether or not to obey the
orders of my superior officer.

I took the trouble to locate the text of the oath of office for a member of
the legislature in the state of Washington. This is the oath which I believe
you swore when you took office as a state representative:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the
United States and the Constitution and laws of the state of Washington, and
that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of (name of
office) to the best of my ability."

Do these words grant you the latitude to "choose to believe" that the
president of the United States is a natural born citizen when there is not a
shred of legally-admissible evidence that he is even a citizen of the United
States, much less a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution;
and when there is overwhelming circumstantial evidence that an authentic
long form birth certificate documenting his claimed birth in the state of
Hawaii simply does not exist?

Sir, I ask you to consider the following hypothetical set of facts: Let us
suppose that you have been a long-time patient of a physician who is
discovered to be an impostor, that this "physician" never actually graduated
from medical school and that the diploma in medicine which he displays in
his office is a forgery.

Would you continue to employ the services of this physician?

As a public official, would you be willing to overlook this impostor
physician's fraudulent acts and allow him to continue practicing medicine
because hundreds of his patients trust him and depend on him?

I think not. Just the thought of allowing such a situation to continue is
unimaginable, yet this is exactly what you are advocating with respect to
the most important office in the land, perhaps in the entire world. The
evidence indicates strongly that we have an impostor in the White House, yet
you say that the vote of the people, many of whom would never have voted for
him if they had known the truth of his citizenship status, overrides the
plain requirements of the Constitution; and you tell me that my concerns are
a "distraction".

I submit to you sir, that this position is nothing less than treason.

You stated that a governmental requirement to provide a birth certificate in
order to exercise certain privileges of citizenship is the mark of a
totalitarian state. Are you saying that a requirement to provide a birth
certificate to obtain a driver's license, to enter military service, to
apply for a passport, even to register a boy to play on a Little League
team, is a characteristic of a totalitarian state? That, sir, is ridiculous.


A totalitarian state is defined in Webster as "a political regime based on
subordination of the individual to the state and strict control of all
aspects of the life and productive capacity of the nation especially by
coercive measures (as censorship and terrorism)". A requirement to produce
documents to verify identity and/or citizenship is a fact of life in the
world today, even for routine air travel. It is not an unreasonable
requirement as a condition of government employment, and it is an absolute
necessity for election to a high level position in government.

The issues we are confronting with Obama are two:

1) Is Barack Obama a "natural born citizen" as required by Article II,
section 1, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution?

The United States Supreme Court provided a definitive ruling on the meaning
of that term in the 1875 case Minor v. Happersett with these words: "it was
never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its
citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were
natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or
foreigners." This ruling is conclusive and binding and has never been
overturned or modified, while it has been affirmed in several other Supreme
Court cases, as well as by Rep. John Bingham, principal author of the
Fourteenth Amendment. Thus we have a two-part NBC requirement - (a) born in
the country, and (b) parents who are citizens. Therefore, even if Obama was
born in Hawaii, he fails the parental citizenship requirement. If he was not
born in Hawaii, he may not even be a U.S. citizen.

The answer is unequivocally no - Barack Obama cannot meet the required
conditions to be qualified to serve as president pursuant to the United
States Constitution. This is not a matter of choosing what to believe or not
to believe. This is the law.

2) Did Obama commit a criminal act in connection with the presentation on
national television on April 27, 2011 of a document which he represented as
his original long-form birth certificate from the state of Hawaii?

The document presented by Obama has been conclusively proven to be a
forgery. Barack Obama committed a felony by presenting a forged document in
an effort publicly undertaken to provide proof of his U.S. birth to the
American people.

The answer is yes - Obama committed a criminal act while serving
fraudulently in the office of president.

Now we have an untenable situation in our federal government. Every act of
this impostor president is illegal and potentially null and void. Every
elected official, state or federal, who becomes aware of these crimes and
fails to take the actions required to resolve this situation is guilty of
the crime of misprision of treason.

Not only do we have an ineligible and unqualified person occupying the
office of the president, we have a usurper president who has life-long
associations with known members of the Communist Party USA, and who is
destroying our country.

Take a look at two examples of what people are saying about this phony
president:

"Obama's polling numbers reflect the growing realization of his arrogance
and his incompetence. The advisors he chose and the programs he initiated
have all proved to be failures and very costly ones at that. Unemployment
rates today equal those of the Great Depression. Millions are on food
stamps. Economic growth is an anemic one percent or so. Even people who
don't listen to presidential speeches or follow the news that closely know
he is a loser." 

(Alan Caruba - 7/26/11)
http://www.teapartynation.com/profiles/blog/list?user=wo5vy0y6lr5s


"As the United States of America continues to drift, many Americans still
seem perplexed that after two-and-a-half years, Barack Obama is a walking
contradiction. He cannot seem to lead; he can only follow and dictate. He
has no policies, only vague concepts and Marxist ideology. He starts wars
and calls them something else. He simultaneously makes Congress responsible
and yet irrelevant. He refuses to be held accountable for anything. It's all
still Bush's fault, you know."

(Doug Patton - 7/26/11) http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/38835

I submit to you, sir, that this situation is unacceptable, and that it
presents a Constitutional crisis to the American people, as well as a
national security emergency of the highest order.

Your failure to do your duty pursuant to your oath of office will by duly
noted.

David F LaRocque
CDR USNR (ret)



-----Original Message-----
From: Hudgins, Rep. Zack [mailto:Zack.Hudgins@leg.wa.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 12:14 AM
To: David LaRocque
Subject: RE: Response from Washington State Rep. Zack Hudgins

David,

As I have _LOTS_ of email from folks on many issues I apologize for keeping
this short.  Also, I am not even sure you live in my district, which usually
takes priority on my correspondence, so this may be my last email.

While you have chosen to believe our President is not a US Citizen, I have
chosen to believe he is. His mother was from Kansas and that makes him a
citizen in my book.  I also believe the President released his birth
certificate and that it is a real birth certificate.  But, his mother being
a citizen is what counts for me - that makes him a citizen.  I don't want to
live in a nation where police or military ask me for my papers to prove I
was born in Texas - that is how totalitarian nations work, not the US.

Funny no one talks about McCain being born outside the US (while his father
was serving in the Navy in Panama), or that Romney's dad was born in Mexico
(interesting story in the NYTimes about how we could have two men running
for President both of whom had fathers born outside the US).  Or that most
people didn't even have birth certificates until relatively recently, that
many of our first Presidents weren't born American Citizens, but British
subjects, and we had a President who spoke English as a second language
(Martin Van Buren spoke Dutch at home.)

I point this out because I don't want to argue with you or anyone else about
what proof is needed to prove the President is who he says he is.  I think
all this distraction about a man who is serving his country as an elected
official doesn't allow most folks to focus on the real problems that face us
- the economy in trouble, a Congress that is taking us to the brink of
economic debt default, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, crime, jobs, home values,
corruption on wall street -- things most people are concerned about.

As Americans we believe the power rests with the people.  The people elected
GWBush and he spent like a drunken sailor.  Then the people elected BObama
and he will be up again in 2012 where the people will decide if he is doing
a good job.  He fought his way through 50 primaries - more than any other
candidate, and then the general election, you don't do that, (or serve as a
State Senator for 12 years) unless you love this wonderful nation of ours.

We got out to Hawaii in 1975 with the Navy, and my father and sister still
live there.  I know they have hospitals and universities and schools there
and I believe our President was born there, on US soil to a US Citizen
mother... why would you ever make that up if you were trying to blend in?
Why not pick Atlanta or Chicago or someplace?  I know you can't be
convinced, but I would suggest you put your obvious talents to work on a
real problem and not whether the sitting President won the last election or
not.

Zack


________________________________________
From: David LaRocque [dlarocq@roadrunner.com]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 11:02 AM
To: Hudgins, Rep. Zack
Cc: salpace@gmail.com
Subject: RE: Response from Washington State Rep. Zack Hudgins

Zack,

Thanks very much for your response. I appreciate the respect and
consideration you have shown to a citizen by providing a substantive
response to my concerns, something which my local congressman has refused to
do.

I have great fondness for the state of Washington, where I served in the
Navy as a naval aviator at NAS Whidbey Island.

By way of response to your comments, please permit me to ask several
questions:

1) How can you be sure that Barack Obama is a U.S. citizen if there are no
legally-admissible documents supporting that claim?

In fact, there is no substantive evidence of a Hawaiian birth, no witnesses
to a new-born baby, no evidence of a pregnant Stanley Ann Dunham in Hawaii
in the summer of 1961, and no hospital maternity records. What we do have is
a fraudulent purported birth certificate (as demonstrated in detail by
Seattle resident Douglas Vogt, president of Archive Index Systems, Inc), and
the affidavit of former Honolulu elections official Tim Adams stating that
no Hawaiian birth certificate exists, as well as the testimony of a former
Marine who reports having met Obama in Honolulu in 1980 and having been told
by Obama that Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya.

There are other indications of a foreign birth, including the fact that
Obama is using a fraudulent Social Security number. When asked about this,
the White House Press Secretary refused to answer the question. The Social
Security Administration has been stone-walling FOIA requests by Attorney
Orly Taitz seeking relevant Social Security records.

The most probable reason for the use of a false SSN is the lack of a proper
and legally-admissible long form birth certificate. Not only is this a
felony in itself, it raises a strong presumption of the commission of
certain other serious crimes, including forgery and election fraud.

Under the U.S. law in effect at the time, if Obama was not born on U.S.
soil, his mother was not old enough at the time to confer U.S. citizenship
on a foreign-born child. (references available).

2) Is a fraudulent election "fair and square"?

As to a fair and square election, The Hawaii Democratic Party refused to
certify that Barack Obama met the requirements of the constitution in order
to be placed on the ballot in Hawaii for the 2008 presidential election. In
order to get around this little problem, Rep. Nancy Pelosi, chairperson of
the Democratic Convention, provided a customized certification letter to
Hawaii election officials which fraudulently certified Obama's Consitutional
eligibility to serve in the office of president, while the Democratic
nomination certification letters to the other forty-nine states omitted the
constitutional eligibility language. Nomination certification letters from
Republican convention officials to all fifty states included language
certifying the Constitutional eligibility of the Republican candidates.

The reason that the Hawaii Democratic Party was unable to certify Obama's
constitutional eligibility was because no birth certificate exists in Hawaii
for Barack Obama.

If Barack Obama was not constitutionally eligible to serve in the office of
president, and if his lack of eligibility was deliberately and fraudulently
concealed by officials of the Democratic Party, then the election was
fraudulent.

These facts are not fiction, and they are very much in the present. The lack
of constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama to serve as president existed
in 2008 and continues to this day. Despite extraordinary efforts of
thousands of American citizens to learn the truth of the origins and
background of Barack Obama, this man and his agents continue to stone-wall
the American people, even presenting a blatantly forged document to the
American people on national television.

3) Are the American people entitled to answers to basic questions about the
origins and background of the person occupying the White House?

4) Does your oath of office permit you to stand by and do nothing while the
plain requirements of the United States Constitution are being ignored for
the sake of political expediency?

I would be grateful for straightforward answers to these simple questions.

David F LaRocque
CDR USNR (ret)


-----Original Message-----
From: Hudgins, Rep. Zack [mailto:Zack.Hudgins@leg.wa.gov]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 9:39 AM
To: dlarocq@roadrunner.com
Subject: RE: Let the truth be known...David LaRocque speaks out!

David,

Thanks for the note.  I believe that our President is a US Citizen (anyone
doubt that a US Citizen from Kansas can give birth to a US Citizen, no
matter the soil?).  And I know the President won a fair and square election.

It is too bad that folks can't be upset with his policies, or upset with his
adversaries for trying to bring the US to default on our debt.  We used to
be able to work things out in this great nation, even if we didn't like each
other, doesn't seem to be the case when I get emails like this focusing on
fiction in the past, not the present (or past) facts.

Zack

Letter FROM a Congressman defending Obama's eligibility

 

 


 
Zack:
 
I'm quite disappointed in your words. Do you truly understand Mr, LaRocque's words and the implications of what you are doing-- or more importantly- NOT doing?  Mr. LaRocque has sent you evidence that:
 
- "Obama" is positively linked to more than 16 stolen Social Security numbers, including 042-68-4425, also used to obtain a fraudulent draft card, applied for using a form developed years after his purported application date.  This is not "birther conspiracy theory"-- it's hard fact, obtained from commercial databases, via accepted techniques, by multiple, professional investigators. It is incredible how you merely attempt to cavalierly dismiss their work. You know what?-- we won't let you this time.
 
- "Obama" has released multiple fraudulent "birth certificates." There is now proof that the 4-27-11 release was forged.   Dozens of document experts have now declared it a fraud. Yes, we know its not in the headlines.  Neither was John Edwards, neither was Bill Clinton, until patriots chose to make it an issue and persisted, in spite of opposition. This issue is far, far more serious than theirs.
 
- "Obama" was, by his own admission, born to an alien father, therefore he is not a natural born citizen and not eligible for the Presidency, no matter where he was born. The 1875 Minor vs. Happersett ruling sets the precedent, which has been upheld and cited numerous times. There isn't even any legal proof that he was born in the USA or is even a citizen, although he has lived here. He appears to have British/Kenyan and Indonesian citizenship, based on what we have found so far.
 
You have committed misprision of felony by NOT acting on this after being put on notice. It may be a while before we get around to you on this, since you are an obscure state official, but we will. We will remember who obstructed justice and committed treason.  You can avoid this by acting now, but it would be preferable if you would act out of duty and patriotism.
 
As far as Obama" "doing a pretty good job"-- I would ask-  "at what?"  If you refer to demolishing our constitution, rights, economy and finances much faster than even Bush, then yes, he is certainly doing a good job at that. He is merely proving the wisdom of the founders who insisted on a natural born citizen in the Presidency, whose loyalties were not divided, who believed and identified with the culture, traditions and interests of America.
Regards,
George Miller
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


-----Original Message-----
From: David LaRocque a href="mailto:dlarocq@roadrunner.com">dlarocq@roadrunner.com>
To: David LaRocque a href="mailto:dlarocq@roadrunner.com">dlarocq@roadrunner.com>
Sent: Wed, Jul 27, 2011 9:53 am
Subject: RE: Third Response from Washington State Rep. Zack Hudgins

Friends,  This is what we are dealing with - they don't want the facts. They pay lip service to the Constitution. Political ideology rules.   I still can't believe it is this bad, but the corruption of our national character is almost total.  It may be too late to save it.  David F LaRocque  **************************************************************************** -----Original Message----- From: Hudgins, Rep. Zack [mailto:Zack.Hudgins@leg.wa.gov]  Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 9:18 AM To: David LaRocque Subject: RE: Scond Response from Washington State Rep. Zack Hudgins  David,  I can not continue an email conversation with you due to my work load, uncertainty of your status as one of my constituents, and accusations of treason.  As retired Navy, you should know that public service is not always easy, and I will now focus my efforts on helping my constituents and not engage in this attack on our President - who I believe to be doing a pretty good job, and who I believe to be a US Citizen.  Zack   ________________________________ From: David LaRocque [dlarocq@roadrunner.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 7:57 PM To: Hudgins, Rep. Zack Subject: RE: Scond Response from Washington State Rep. Zack Hudgins  Zack,  I thank you for your response. However, I am quite disappointed that you did not even begin to answer my simple questions. .  Frankly, I am stunned by your response. Apparently, to your way of thinking, the Constitution and the rule of law are of no consequence. You are saying that the specific requirements of the Constitution which apply to determining eligibility for the office of president of the United States should be overlooked and ignored because "the power rests with the people".  What does this mean? Do we make up the rules as we go? Can a fraudulent election, or any election for that matter, overturn the Constitution of the United States? If you believe this, you have no business serving in any legislative body in this country, state or federal.  I simply cannot accept such a crazy notion.  I took an oath of office to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic" when I accepted a commission as an officer of the United States Navy. This oath does not have an expiration date, and I am very clear about what it requires of me. It does not permit me to "choose what to believe" about the requirements of the Constitution any more than it allows me to choose whether or not to obey the orders of my superior officer.  I took the trouble to locate the text of the oath of office for a member of the legislature in the state of Washington. This is the oath which I believe you swore when you took office as a state representative:  "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution and laws of the state of Washington, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of (name of office) to the best of my ability."  Do these words grant you the latitude to "choose to believe" that the president of the United States is a natural born citizen when there is not a shred of legally-admissible evidence that he is even a citizen of the United States, much less a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution; and when there is overwhelming circumstantial evidence that an authentic long form birth certificate documenting his claimed birth in the state of Hawaii simply does not exist?  Sir, I ask you to consider the following hypothetical set of facts: Let us suppose that you have been a long-time patient of a physician who is discovered to be an impostor, that this "physician" never actually graduated from medical school and that the diploma in medicine which he displays in his office is a forgery.  Would you continue to employ the services of this physician?  As a public official, would you be willing to overlook this impostor physician's fraudulent acts and allow him to continue practicing medicine because hundreds of his patients trust him and depend on him?  I think not. Just the thought of allowing such a situation to continue is unimaginable, yet this is exactly what you are advocating with respect to the most important office in the land, perhaps in the entire world. The evidence indicates strongly that we have an impostor in the White House, yet you say that the vote of the people, many of whom would never have voted for him if they had known the truth of his citizenship status, overrides the plain requirements of the Constitution; and you tell me that my concerns are a "distraction".  I submit to you sir, that this position is nothing less than treason.  You stated that a governmental requirement to provide a birth certificate in order to exercise certain privileges of citizenship is the mark of a totalitarian state. Are you saying that a requirement to provide a birth certificate to obtain a driver's license, to enter military service, to apply for a passport, even to register a boy to play on a Little League team, is a characteristic of a totalitarian state? That, sir, is ridiculous.  A totalitarian state is defined in Webster as "a political regime based on subordination of the individual to the state and strict control of all aspects of the life and productive capacity of the nation especially by coercive measures (as censorship and terrorism)". A requirement to produce documents to verify identity and/or citizenship is a fact of life in the world today, even for routine air travel. It is not an unreasonable requirement as a condition of government employment, and it is an absolute necessity for election to a high level position in government.  The issues we are confronting with Obama are two:  1) Is Barack Obama a "natural born citizen" as required by Article II, section 1, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution?  The United States Supreme Court provided a definitive ruling on the meaning of that term in the 1875 case Minor v. Happersett with these words: "it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners." This ruling is conclusive and binding and has never been overturned or modified, while it has been affirmed in several other Supreme Court cases, as well as by Rep. John Bingham, principal author of the Fourteenth Amendment. Thus we have a two-part NBC requirement - (a) born in the country, and (b) parents who are citizens. Therefore, even if Obama was born in Hawaii, he fails the parental citizenship requirement. If he was not born in Hawaii, he may not even be a U.S. citizen.  The answer is unequivocally no - Barack Obama cannot meet the required conditions to be qualified to serve as president pursuant to the United States Constitution. This is not a matter of choosing what to believe or not to believe. This is the law.  2) Did Obama commit a criminal act in connection with the presentation on national television on April 27, 2011 of a document which he represented as his original long-form birth certificate from the state of Hawaii?  The document presented by Obama has been conclusively proven to be a forgery. Barack Obama committed a felony by presenting a forged document in an effort publicly undertaken to provide proof of his U.S. birth to the American people.  The answer is yes - Obama committed a criminal act while serving fraudulently in the office of president.  Now we have an untenable situation in our federal government. Every act of this impostor president is illegal and potentially null and void. Every elected official, state or federal, who becomes aware of these crimes and fails to take the actions required to resolve this situation is guilty of the crime of misprision of treason.  Not only do we have an ineligible and unqualified person occupying the office of the president, we have a usurper president who has life-long associations with known members of the Communist Party USA, and who is destroying our country.  Take a look at two examples of what people are saying about this phony president:  "Obama's polling numbers reflect the growing realization of his arrogance and his incompetence. The advisors he chose and the programs he initiated have all proved to be failures and very costly ones at that. Unemployment rates today equal those of the Great Depression. Millions are on food stamps. Economic growth is an anemic one percent or so. Even people who don't listen to presidential speeches or follow the news that closely know he is a loser."  (Alan Caruba - 7/26/11) http://www.teapartynation.com/profiles/blog/list?user=wo5vy0y6lr5s   "As the United States of America continues to drift, many Americans still seem perplexed that after two-and-a-half years, Barack Obama is a walking contradiction. He cannot seem to lead; he can only follow and dictate. He has no policies, only vague concepts and Marxist ideology. He starts wars and calls them something else. He simultaneously makes Congress responsible and yet irrelevant. He refuses to be held accountable for anything. It's all still Bush's fault, you know."  (Doug Patton - 7/26/11) http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/38835  I submit to you, sir, that this situation is unacceptable, and that it presents a Constitutional crisis to the American people, as well as a national security emergency of the highest order.  Your failure to do your duty pursuant to your oath of office will by duly noted.  David F LaRocque CDR USNR (ret)    -----Original Message----- From: Hudgins, Rep. Zack [mailto:Zack.Hudgins@leg.wa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 12:14 AM To: David LaRocque Subject: RE: Response from Washington State Rep. Zack Hudgins  David,  As I have _LOTS_ of email from folks on many issues I apologize for keeping this short.  Also, I am not even sure you live in my district, which usually takes priority on my correspondence, so this may be my last email.  While you have chosen to believe our President is not a US Citizen, I have chosen to believe he is. His mother was from Kansas and that makes him a citizen in my book.  I also believe the President released his birth certificate and that it is a real birth certificate.  But, his mother being a citizen is what counts for me - that makes him a citizen.  I don't want to live in a nation where police or military ask me for my papers to prove I was born in Texas - that is how totalitarian nations work, not the US.  Funny no one talks about McCain being born outside the US (while his father was serving in the Navy in Panama), or that Romney's dad was born in Mexico (interesting story in the NYTimes about how we could have two men running for President both of whom had fathers born outside the US).  Or that most people didn't even have birth certificates until relatively recently, that many of our first Presidents weren't born American Citizens, but British subjects, and we had a President who spoke English as a second language (Martin Van Buren spoke Dutch at home.)  I point this out because I don't want to argue with you or anyone else about what proof is needed to prove the President is who he says he is.  I think all this distraction about a man who is serving his country as an elected official doesn't allow most folks to focus on the real problems that face us - the economy in trouble, a Congress that is taking us to the brink of economic debt default, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, crime, jobs, home values, corruption on wall street -- things most people are concerned about.  As Americans we believe the power rests with the people.  The people elected GWBush and he spent like a drunken sailor.  Then the people elected BObama and he will be up again in 2012 where the people will decide if he is doing a good job.  He fought his way through 50 primaries - more than any other candidate, and then the general election, you don't do that, (or serve as a State Senator for 12 years) unless you love this wonderful nation of ours.  We got out to Hawaii in 1975 with the Navy, and my father and sister still live there.  I know they have hospitals and universities and schools there and I believe our President was born there, on US soil to a US Citizen mother... why would you ever make that up if you were trying to blend in? Why not pick Atlanta or Chicago or someplace?  I know you can't be convinced, but I would suggest you put your obvious talents to work on a real problem and not whether the sitting President won the last election or not.  Zack   ________________________________________ From: David LaRocque [dlarocq@roadrunner.com] Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 11:02 AM To: Hudgins, Rep. Zack Cc: salpace@gmail.com Subject: RE: Response from Washington State Rep. Zack Hudgins  Zack,  Thanks very much for your response. I appreciate the respect and consideration you have shown to a citizen by providing a substantive response to my concerns, something which my local congressman has refused to do.  I have great fondness for the state of Washington, where I served in the Navy as a naval aviator at NAS Whidbey Island.  By way of response to your comments, please permit me to ask several questions:  1) How can you be sure that Barack Obama is a U.S. citizen if there are no legally-admissible documents supporting that claim?  In fact, there is no substantive evidence of a Hawaiian birth, no witnesses to a new-born baby, no evidence of a pregnant Stanley Ann Dunham in Hawaii in the summer of 1961, and no hospital maternity records. What we do have is a fraudulent purported birth certificate (as demonstrated in detail by Seattle resident Douglas Vogt, president of Archive Index Systems, Inc), and the affidavit of former Honolulu elections official Tim Adams stating that no Hawaiian birth certificate exists, as well as the testimony of a former Marine who reports having met Obama in Honolulu in 1980 and having been told by Obama that Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya.  There are other indications of a foreign birth, including the fact that Obama is using a fraudulent Social Security number. When asked about this, the White House Press Secretary refused to answer the question. The Social Security Administration has been stone-walling FOIA requests by Attorney Orly Taitz seeking relevant Social Security records.  The most probable reason for the use of a false SSN is the lack of a proper and legally-admissible long form birth certificate. Not only is this a felony in itself, it raises a strong presumption of the commission of certain other serious crimes, including forgery and election fraud.  Under the U.S. law in effect at the time, if Obama was not born on U.S. soil, his mother was not old enough at the time to confer U.S. citizenship on a foreign-born child. (references available).  2) Is a fraudulent election "fair and square"?  As to a fair and square election, The Hawaii Democratic Party refused to certify that Barack Obama met the requirements of the constitution in order to be placed on the ballot in Hawaii for the 2008 presidential election. In order to get around this little problem, Rep. Nancy Pelosi, chairperson of the Democratic Convention, provided a customized certification letter to Hawaii election officials which fraudulently certified Obama's Consitutional eligibility to serve in the office of president, while the Democratic nomination certification letters to the other forty-nine states omitted the constitutional eligibility language. Nomination certification letters from Republican convention officials to all fifty states included language certifying the Constitutional eligibility of the Republican candidates.  The reason that the Hawaii Democratic Party was unable to certify Obama's constitutional eligibility was because no birth certificate exists in Hawaii for Barack Obama.  If Barack Obama was not constitutionally eligible to serve in the office of president, and if his lack of eligibility was deliberately and fraudulently concealed by officials of the Democratic Party, then the election was fraudulent.  These facts are not fiction, and they are very much in the present. The lack of constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama to serve as president existed in 2008 and continues to this day. Despite extraordinary efforts of thousands of American citizens to learn the truth of the origins and background of Barack Obama, this man and his agents continue to stone-wall the American people, even presenting a blatantly forged document to the American people on national television.  3) Are the American people entitled to answers to basic questions about the origins and background of the person occupying the White House?  4) Does your oath of office permit you to stand by and do nothing while the plain requirements of the United States Constitution are being ignored for the sake of political expediency?  I would be grateful for straightforward answers to these simple questions.  David F LaRocque CDR USNR (ret)   -----Original Message----- From: Hudgins, Rep. Zack [mailto:Zack.Hudgins@leg.wa.gov] Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 9:39 AM To: dlarocq@roadrunner.com Subject: RE: Let the truth be known...David LaRocque speaks out!  David,  Thanks for the note.  I believe that our President is a US Citizen (anyone doubt that a US Citizen from Kansas can give birth to a US Citizen, no matter the soil?).  And I know the President won a fair and square election.  It is too bad that folks can't be upset with his policies, or upset with his adversaries for trying to bring the US to default on our debt.  We used to be able to work things out in this great nation, even if we didn't like each other, doesn't seem to be the case when I get emails like this focusing on fiction in the past, not the present (or past) facts.  Zack    

 

To: Congressman Tom McClintock
 
Hi Tom:
 
As my former representative, I hold you in high esteem and also voted for you for Governor. I am a well-regarded retired businessman.
 
After reading the letter appearing below this one, purportedly from you, I offer the following thoughts. I'm writing to ask you to reconsider your position on the eligibility issue-- please hear me out.
 
1. There was no vetting process. That has been confirmed at the federal level and for various states, including our own (please research the case against Debra Bowen, Secretary of State). Nancy Pelosi omitted the Constitutional eligibility statement in her 2008 "Obama" candidate certification in 49 states and apparently perjured herself in the 50th (Hawaii).  The "media" glossed over the vetting of "Obama" and seemed strangely incurious, relying mostly upon the two somewhat fictional "autobiographies."   "Obama" offered almost no background and substantiation of his past.  In fact, he has actively and aggressively covered it up, in an unprecedented manner.  If you can point out how and who he was vetted by, we would like to help enlighten the benighted public, who question "Obama's" legitimacy.
 
2. It is fairly clear, from the papers of the founding fathers and De Vattel's Law of Nations, a primary reference used by them in the writing of the Constitution, that they thought of a natural born citizen as someone born in this country of two citizen parents at the time of that person's birth. SR 511 appears to harbor similar assumptions. This has  been repeatedly confirmed by Congress and the Supreme Court. However, CRS wrote a very misleading memo about eligibility, distorting both facts and case law, particularly Minor vs. Happersett. This has been documented in several articles, which we will forward upon request.
 
3. The withholding of "Obama's" vital  papers and expenditure of possibly up to $2MM to defend him in eligibility legal actions, plus an undetermined amount from DOJ funds, is an outrage.  They should have been prosecuting, not defending him.
 
4.  There is documented, indisputable evidence, compiled by multiple independent private investigators (Sankey, Daniels and others), that:
    - "Obama" is linked to at least 16 stolen Social Security numbers, including 042-68-4425, via name and addresses.
    - This was uncovered via commercial databases and other research.
    - That led to a finding that his Selective Service registration, linked to the aforementioned Social Security number, is also fraudulent and apparently forged circa 2008.
   - At least one of his purported mother's Social Security numbers appears to be stolen.
   - We are told by investigators that this normally happens either when people cannot obtain such documentation legally, or are using it to break the law, usually for financial gain or other felony fraud.
 
5. There is no record of him ever legally changing his name from Barry Soetoro or Soebarkah to his current AKA.  There is also evidence linking him to an alias of Harrison Bounel.
 
6. The so-called birth certificate was, after over three years of stalling. finally released in digital form by "Obama," via the White House staff, on 4-27-11, with limited copies made from an undetermined source document.  It has been declared a fraud by dozens of document experts, some of them very well-known and respected.  In short, it opens up in Adobe Illustrator as a nine-layered document, displaying numerous symptoms known to experts as evidence of alteration.
 
7. John McCain was submitted to an extensive investigation and humiliating Senate hearing, on his eligibility for the Presidency, in spite of having a very well-documented history and two American citizen parents. His family has served with distinction as military officers for multiple generations. Even though he was born in Panama (NOT the at the time Canal Zone, a U.S. Possession, as many thought), he was declared eligible, because his father was serving his country as a military officer, a special case.  No such hearing was ever held for his Democrat opponent, who had far more mysterious circumstances in his past and had already been served for eligibility suits. Some say this was some sort of quid pro quo. Whatever.
 
8. You didn't raise the issue in your letter, but the so-called "birth announcements":
  - Are unvetted
  - Are not legal documents
  - Could have been triggered via relatives in a request, or Certification (NOT Certificate) of Live Birth, obtained with only an affidavit, under Hawaiian law.
  - Do not state the name of the child
  - Do not state the place of birth
  - List a false address, where the parents never lived
 
Congress and courts have both failed to act on the issues, to date. The Courts claim it's Congress' responsibility and Congress vice- versa. You say it's a non-issue. About half of the public at large surveyed think otherwise.
 
We do NOT intend to roll over and let this go away. The stakes are way too high. The founders established a high bar for eligibility, precisely to help avoid situations like we have now, with a chief executive whose priorities, loyalties, ideology and revered traditions clearly do not stand with We The People.  This and his many impeachable offenses, are far worse than Watergate and Monicagate to the nth power.
 
We hope and pray that you will have the courage to act, to motivate the House of Reps to investigate this and act accordingly.  I also ask you to help motivate the FBI to move on the multiple complaints submitted.
 
We do not think it is sufficient to wait until January 2013 to solve the problem, particularly because he has been so very dangerous and destructive in office and seems willing to commit massive fraud to get his way, with powerful forces enabling him to do so.


Regards,
George Miller
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
 
from: Congressman Tom McClintock ca04tmima@mail.house.gov via yahoo.com
to: SASKA
date Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:36 PM
subject RE: President Obama's Eligibility to Serve
Dear Saska:
 
Thank you for contacting me to express your concerns regarding President Barack Obama's citizenship and his eligibility to serve as president.
 
The Constitution is the starting point for determining eligibility to serve as President. The Constitution requires that to be eligible to serve as President an individual must be a natural born citizen of the United States, be at least 35 years old, and have been a permanent resident in the United States for at least 14 years. 
 
Currently, a candidate's eligibility under these requirements is vetted by a number of sources, both inside the government and out.  First, candidates go through an intensive political vetting process in both the primary and general election – their histories are carefully examined by their political opponents who have a vested interest in uncovering the facts.  At the end of the campaigns, the voting public weighs in.  Then, when all the votes have been cast and counted, it is up to Congress to certify the results.  A final check-and-balance against eligibility irregularities lies with the courts, and ultimately the Supreme Court.
 
President Obama has passed each of these requirements.  Further, in President Obama's case – in addition to his Hawaii birth certificate – there were two birth announcements in major Hawaii newspapers, the Honolulu Advertiser and the Star Bulletin.
 
Thanks again for contacting me, and I look forward to hearing from you again in the future.  Should you have any further questions regarding this or any other issue, please don't hesitate to contact me via email or my Washington D.C. office at (202) 225-2511 or my district office in Granite Bay at (916) 786-5560.
Sincerely,
Tom

Typical blog response comment , on a tangentally related subject (Boehner and budget in this case), to build awareness of other Conservatives not involved on the eligibility movement

 

Harry can't spend what John doesn't originate/approve. Any GOP concessions are based upon Republcan lack of nerve and being outtalked by Barry, MSM, Moveon, etc.  "Boner" is severely underplaying his cards.  Hope he's better at golf than poker.

 

As for B. Hussein, just one judge can move along Taitz vs. Astrue, which you DO know is now in discovery, with open subpoenas for Obama's Social Security records, application etc., right? You DO know that there are now proven links of 16+ Social Security numbers to Obama, by multiple professional investigators, right? And that Obama has been unable to get THIS case dismissed?  You DO know that the so-called "birth certificate" has been declared a forgery by dozens of documemt experts and a complaint was recently forwarded to the FBI, right?  You Do know that the 1875 Minor vs, Happersett ruling precedent has withstood the test of time and says that a natural born citizen is born in the USA of two citizen parents, RIGHT?  You DO know that the Barnett, Drake, Keyes, et al vs. Obama case is stil alive in appeal, since 2009, right?  You do know that several other cases are lined up, right? You do know that the evidence for this issue and dozens of impeachable offenses are there and only need to be acted upon, right?  You do know that  CRS wrote fraudulent eligibility memos that Congress critters have been using as a crutch, which is about to be kicked out, right? 

 

Whether or not we succeed, this WILL be used as an election issue, by us, if not the spineless politicians who would be king.  More: http://www.teapartynation.com/forum/topics/the-eligibility-issue?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

 

it was in response to this comment:

 

George,

What is your point?? We all know that we now have a majority in the house!! However, there are two other branches that we DO NOT control. The Senate and the Presidency.

Until we get those we cannot make anything happen. We can try, however with BO and the likes of Hairy Reid we cannot make it happen. Just like the CCB bill. We can pass it all day long in the house but when it gets to the Senate it is dead on arrival. Even if it passed the Senate, BO would veto it and we do not have enough votes to overide his veto.

 

WAKE UP AMERICA!!!

LET IT BE KNOWN ....

an excellent summary of the case for Obama ineligibility

American Citizens’ Demand for Justice Against the Overthrow of the U.S. Constitution

AND THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR TO INVESTIGATE OBAMA

submitted by Kathleen Gotto

 

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/05/31/american-citizens-demand-for...

 

This is something you can use to quickly acquaint people with the main points of our case and provide some backup to answer more detailed questions/objections.

 

Don't lose sight of the goal.

From Doug Vogt, one of the main exposers of the forged birth certificate. Here's some stuff you can DO.

 

Dear Friends and Supporters,

Thank you to the 4 people who donated a total of $150 towards the mailing costs. I have printed enough of the 28-page final report on the Obama Forged COLB and the signed Affidavit of July 7 covering the case of Plausible Deniability against Robert Bauer and Daniel Pfeiffer in their April 27, 20110 news conference. You should read it because they are indirectly acknowledging that what they were presenting that morning was a fraud and forgery! http://www.archiveindex.com/Obamas_Certificate_Forgery.html

 

My letters to the Hawaiian Attorney General David Louie and Governor Neil Abercrombie were mailed off 7/11/11 Certified Mail (to Louie 70103090000164047828, Gov. 70103090000164047842) and received 7/14/11. A copy of this letter can be seen on www.archiveindex.com/Hawaii_AG_and_Gov_letter_7-9-11.pdf. The next day the AG’s office said that the Deputy Attorney went on leave and will not be back until next week and Director Loretta Fuddy left the Island—read the Plausible Deniability affidavit listed above and you will know why she left town fast! They didn’t say where she went. It looks like my letter worked and the AG and Governor wants to stay as far away from this fraud as possible. See Orly’s site for story. http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=23857

 

The Report and Affidavit was also mailed to the US Attorney in Honolulu, Florence Nakakuni (Certified Mail #70103090000164047835, delivered 7/14/11).

 

My next step is mailing off the two reports to all the Republican Congressman and Senators. I have enough postage for 116 mailings (4oz. ea envelope, $1.04 ea., 6x9 envelopes cost was $29+ tax). A copy of this letter will be on my web site for you to download and modify to your liking. I will need additional contributions to mail to all the rest of the 300+ Congressmen and Senators. You can mail contributions or stamps to:

Douglas Vogt

Vector Associates, 12819 S.E. 38th Street, Suite 115, Bellevue, WA 98006

Or can call me and I can take your credit card over the phone. I’d love to talk to you anyway.

Link to my letter to Congressmen: www.archiveindex.com/letter_to_congress_7-18-11.doc

 

My cover letter will remind them that this scandal is the worst in American history and it is going to hit the domestic as well as foreign media this year. The American voters will want to know why the Republicans did not ask for Congressional hearing or at least ask the FBI to do an investigation. If the Republicans continue to do nothing then expect there will be a political price to pay. I am also going to suggest they use this forgery information when they are negotiation with the administration over the national debt and the budget.

Here are links to the names and addresses of all the Congressmen and Senators for you to contact:

http://www.house.gov/representatives/

Senators: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

All elected officials both federal and state:

http://www.congressweb.com/cweb2/index.cfm/siteid/resourcecenter/ac...

All the election officials in the USA:
http://www.congressweb.com/cweb2/index.cfm/siteid/resourcecenter/ac...

All the US News Media:

These are the links you can use that will tell you all the newspapers in the USA:
http://www.congressweb.com/cweb2/index.cfm/siteid/resourcecenter/ac...

For Foreign and Domestic media including TV, Radio, Newspapers all over the world:
http://www.mondotimes.com/

Mailing off news releases to the foreign media might get faster results because they are not under the influence of the Obama administration. If you contact the media while I am notifying the Congress and the US Attorneys and Judges, we might get some action. I will put up a suggested News Release format you should use to notify the news media. Go onto the Birthers Secure Forum: http://birthers.tpath.org/login.aspx

 

Thank you for your help and support.

Douglas Vogt

doug@vectorpub.com

 

Hey gang:  How about helping him with his expenses?

 
HAS OBAMA MET HIS MATCH?
 
This article by Joan Swirsky is stunning!  Some things here may need additional corroboration. Be careful about sending this to newbies, since some of it is only partially corroborated, because it appears to come from confidential sources. It will be interesting to see what develops from this.


from the article above: http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/05/10/trump-is-already-running-the...

Come to think of it, what is it about Obama and dumping people’s remains in the ocean? On October 24, 2008, 11 days before the election, Obama arrived alone on a night flight to Honolulu, where his “typical white person” maternal grandmother was reported by the Obamamedia to be gravely ill, but not quite ill enough for Michelle and the granddaughters to make the trip. What was going through Obama’s mind? How could he possibly know that his ‘beloved’ grandmother would die the day before the election? What secrets about Obama’s ‘father’ did she take with her to her grave? Madalyn Dunham died ‘suddenly’ of previously-unannounced `terminal cancer’ while convalescing from a broken hip in her bungalow one day before the U.S. general election in Nov. 2008. Her remains were cremated – against her written wishes – within 12 hours after death. Mmmmm….does anyone else but me smell a rat?

RSS

© 2017   Created by Greg.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service